Global Warming: Man or Myth?

Scientists can also wear their citizen hats

Washington Times: Tsk, Tsk, Tsk

with 7 comments

My Letter to the Editor in response to a very poor editorial:

Your March 17th editorial titled “Ending the global-warming argument” has confused science with politics. There is no informed debate that humans are overloading the air with too much carbon and that this carbon is causing the planet to dramatically warm. There is no informed debate that increasing carbon will cause this warming to continue. (For perspective, the amount of CO2 that is added to the air every day by human activities, primarily from burning fossil fuels, is equal to the amount of oil spilled by 8,000 Gulf Oil Spills per day.) Virtually every publishing scientist and all international science academies agree on this.

Who else is concerned? Military and intelligence experts warn that climate-induced crises could topple governments, feed terrorist movements or destabilize entire regions. Health officials warn us that climate change could be the biggest global health threat of the 21st century. Climate change was recently listed as the greatest strategic risk currently facing the property/casualty insurance industry.

We need to reduce our emissions of carbon for the sake of our public health, national security, and economic competitiveness. Surely it is foolish to base our economic energy needs on sources that are dwindling in supply and increasing in price when, instead, we could move toward energy efficiency and cheaper-by-the-year, infinite sources such as the sun and wind. If we stay addicted to fossil fuels and do not begin investing in those technologies now, we will be buying them from China in the future instead of selling it to them.

Update: March 24, 2011: Please see the superb post by grypo over at Skeptical Science titled The Washington Times Talks Greenhouse Law

About these ads

Written by Scott Mandia

March 18, 2011 at 8:40 am

Posted in Uncategorized

7 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Great Letter Dr. Mandia!

    Did they print it?

    MapleLeaf

    March 18, 2011 at 4:22 pm

  2. Perfect timing with conflict in the Middle East raising fuel prices and reinforcing the lack of control on supply.

    mspelto

    March 19, 2011 at 12:41 pm

  3. Professor Mandia,

    Skeptical Science has an article about this by me.

    http://www.skepticalscience.com/washington-times-talks-greenhouse-law.html

    Mandia: Great post! I just added your post as an update here

    gryposaurus

    March 24, 2011 at 7:09 am

  4. I added a link to the comments section of the Washington Post to this response. Even if it doesn’t get published in the paper, the online viewers can take a look.

    Thor's Child

    March 24, 2011 at 2:37 pm

  5. [...] "there would be no link to the companies under legal assault", I will point to part of Professor Scott Mandia's letter that he sent to the Washington Times in [...]

  6. [...] "there would be no link to the companies under legal assault", I will point to part of Professor Scott Mandia's letter that he sent to the Washington Times in [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,834 other followers

%d bloggers like this: